Observation of giant magnetocaloric effect under low magnetic fields in EuTi1–xcoxo3
Sun Qi-Lei1, Mo Zhao-Jun2, Shen Jun3, Li Yu-Jin1, Li Lan2, Zhang Jun-Kai2, Liu Guo-Dong1, Tang Cheng-Chun1, Meng Fan-Bin1, †
School of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
Key Laboratory of Display Materials and Photoelectric Devices of Ministry of Education of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Optoelectronic Materials and Devices of Tianjin, Institute of Material Physics, School of Material Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300191, China
Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: fanbinmeng@126.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11504266, 51271192, 51322605, and 51371075) and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China (Grant No. 17JCQNJC02300).

Abstract

The magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect (MCE) in EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) compounds have been investigated. When the Ti4+ ions were substituted by Co2+ ions, the delicate balance was changed between antiferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) phases in the EuTiO3 compound. In EuTi1−xCoxO3 system, a giant reversible MCE and large refrigerant capacity (RC) were observed without hysteresis. The values of were evaluated to be around 10 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1 for EuTi0.95Co0.05O3 under a magnetic field change of 10 kOe. The giant reversible MCE and large RC suggests that EuTi1−xCoxO3 series could be considered as good candidate materials for low-temperature and low-field magnetic refrigerant.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the development of magnetic refrigeration technology based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) has provided a new choice for traditional gas refrigeration with great significance in saving energy and environment protection.[1] In varying magnetic fields, the MCE is the magneto–thermodynamic phenomenon of a magnetic material evaluated from the isothermal magnetic entropy change (−ΔSM) and the adiabatic temperature change (ΔT). A number of materials exhibiting giant −ΔSM have been found near transition temperatures, such as LaCaMnO3,[2] MnAs1 - xSbx,[3] MnFeX (X = P, As, Si, Ge),[4] La (Fe, M)13 (M = Si, Al), Ni–Mn–Ga alloy new materials,[5,6] and so on. In addition, it is also valuable to study at low temperatures in the fields of hydrogen liquefaction and air science.

In the past few years, the research of large MCE materials at low temperatures mainly focused on the rare earth intermetallic compounds and the classical materials: RAl2,[710] RNi (R = Gd, Ho, Er),[11] RMAl (M = Ni, Co, Cu),[12,13] etc. Currently, oxide has become a new research hotspot. The spin degree of freedom, the orbital degree of freedom, and the coupling and interaction between lattice degrees of freedom in the perovskite RTiO3 (R = rare earth) system, make the RTiO3 system show many peculiar physical phenomena. In EuTiO3, Ti is tetravalent (3d0) and Eu is divalent with a large spin moment (S = 7/2) due to the stable 4f7 electronic configuration. The cubic perovskite EuTiO3 has aroused widespread concern with the G-type AFM order, large magneto–electric (ME) effect and the quantum paraelectric (PE) behavior.[14,15] In EuTiO3, there may be two exchange mechanisms based on the first-principles calculation of the nearest neighbor Eu interaction. One is the super-exchange mechanism that leads to antiferromagnetic (AFM) exchange, which is between Eu2+ 4f spins via the 3d states of nonmagnetic Ti4+ ions. The other is the indirect exchange mechanism, which leads to ferromagnetic (FM) exchange via the Eu 5d states.[16,17] The competition of AFM and FM phases is a delicate balance. The magnetic ground state can be switched from AFM to FM due to its strong spin lattice coupling in the EuTiO3, when the lattice constants were changed such as a increased with the lattice constant relaxed or c increased with a fixed.[18] The delicate change may cause an important effect on the magnetic entropy. It has been shown that a small amount of (Ba and Sr) substitution at the Eusite or (Cr and Nb) substitution at the Ti site drives the system into a FM metallic state. For example, Rubi reported the magnetic entropy change in magnetoelectric Eu1−xBaxTiO3 for 0.1 < x < 0.9.[19] Mo et al. reported the giant magnetocaloric effect in Eu1 - xSrxTiO3 and EuTi1−xCrxO3.[20,21] Roy et al. reported the −ΔSM in magnetoelectric EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 compound.[22]

In this paper, with Ti to be substituted by Co, EuTi1−xCoxO3 compounds exhibit a giant reversible MCE. At the same time, it is possible that Co with a certain magnetic moment will impact the nature of the sample. The results show that EuTi1−xCoxO3 processes an effective application prospect at low temperature magnetic refrigeration.

2. Experiments

The samples of EuTi1 - xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) were synthesized by the sol–gel method. In the first step, a stoichiometric amount of europium oxide (Eu2O3), butyl phthalate (Ti(OC4H9)4) and cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2), were dissolved into 25 mL of nitric acid (HNO3 8 mol/L). Then, the ethylene glycol was added as a dispersant and then continually stirred for about 1 h to make it completely dissolved. In the second step, the solution was heated at 90 °C until a dry gel was obtained. In the third step, the samples were pretreated at 400 °C for 30 min, then cooled down and ground into powder. In the fourth step, the samples were heated 900 °C for 2 h in air to remove carbon. Finally, the samples were annealed at 1100 °C in 10% H2 and 90% Ar atmosphere for 3 h to obtain EuTi1 - xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) materials.

The structures of the EuTi1 - xCoxO3 were determined by x-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation at room temperature, and then the magnetic properties of the samples were analyzed by a physical property measurement system (PPMS).

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) samples. No other impurities can be found such as Eu2Ti2O7, Eu2O3, and TiO2 and crystallizing in the cubic perovskite structure (space group 221). With the increase of Co content, the diffraction peaks slightly move to the left due to the size of Co2+ (∼ 0.745 Å) which is bigger than Ti4+ (∼ 0.605 Å) as shown in the inset of Fig. 1. Eu3+ or oxygen vacancy is easliy formed due to mismatch of valence (Co2+ ion and Ti4+ ion). The oxygen vacancy is favorable for the magnetic transition.[23]

Fig. 1. (color online) The XRD patterns of the EuTi1 - xCoxO3 (x = 0.1 (a), 0.075 (b), 0.05 (c), 0.025 (d), 0 (e)). Inset: the corresponding local amplification figure.

Figure 2 shows the function of magnetization versus temperature in the cases of zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) of the EuTi1 - xCoxO3 compounds under an applied magnetic field of 0.1 kOe. The EuTiO3 is clearly AFM type and has phase transition from AFM to PM at TN = 5.7 K with no thermal hysteresis. The TN = 5.7 K (AFM transition temperature) is similar to the previous results.[24,25] With the increase of Co doping content (x = 0.025, x = 0.05, x = 0.075, and x = 0.1), the ZFC and FC curves of the samples have an obvious bifurcation below the transition temperature, which may be the nature of spin-glass-like behaviors.

Fig. 2. (color online) Temperature dependences of ZFC and FC magnetizations of EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0.1 (a), 0.075 (b), 0.05 (c), 0.025 (d), 0 (e)) under the magnetic field of 0.1 kOe.

In Fig. 3, the magnetization data of the magnetic field increases coincide with the decreases at 2 K, indicating no magnetic hysteresis; there is a beneficial effect on the magnetic entropy and cooling capacity of the material without magnetic hysteresis. The inset of Fig. 3 shows the magnetic moment calculated per Eu2+ atom in EuTi1 - xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) compounds for 50 kOe at 2 K. With doping Co2+ ions, the magnetic moment decreases from 6.1μB (x = 0) to 5.5μB (x = 0.025) and from 6.0μB (x = 0.05) to 5.6μB (x = 0.075, 0.1). It is possible that some Eu2+ ions were converted to Eu3+ ions (without magnetic moments), leading to the decrease of total magnetic moments as the Co2+ ion content increases. On the other hand, the Eu2+ ions did not convert to Eu3+ ions, but produced the oxygen vacancies. However, Co2+ ions have a certain magnetic moment, the exchange may decrease the total magnetic moment which comes from Eu2+4f spins and the Co2+3d spins (further research is needed to confirm the exchange mechanism between Eu2+4f spins and the Co2+3d spins).

Fig. 3. (color online) The field dependences of magnetization data both increasing and decreasing field model at 2 K. Inset: the μBx curve.

Figure 4 shows the isothermal magnetization curves from 2 K to 5 K with an increment of 1 K at 0–50 kOe applied magnetic field. In Fig. 4 (x = 0), the high temperature magnetization is greater than the value at low temperatures under low fields. On the contrary, the situation is the opposite in higher fields. It is consistent with the AFM ordering of the compound below TN.[12] However, there are no intersections among the curves as shown in Fig. 4 (x = 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1), which can be seen in the FM magnetic ground state. The FM coupling gradually increases, and slightly dominates in the delicate balance between AFM and FM phases, when the Ti is substituted by Co. Figure 5 shows the Arrott curve (the curve of M2 for H/M in the case of isothermal) of EuTi1 − xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1). When the slope of the curve is negative, the magnetic transition is the first order, whereas it will be of second order based on the Banerjee criterion.[26] The EuTiO3 is the first order with the negative slope of the Arrott plots below TN. The results of EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) suggest that the phase transition is second order for the positive slope of the Arrott plot.

Fig. 4. (color online) Magnetization isotherms of EuTi1 - xCoxO3 compounds collected at 2, 3, 4 and 5 K under low fields (x = 0 (a); x = 0.025 (b); x = 0.05 (c); x = 0.075 (d); x = 0.1(e)).
Fig. 5. (color online) The Arrott plot of the EuTi1 − xCoxO3 compounds at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 K under low fields (x = 0 (a); x = 0.025 (b); x = 0.05 (c); x = 0.075 (d); x =0.1(e)).

The values of ΔSM can be calculated by the magnetization isotherms using the Maxwell relation .[27] Figure 6 shows the values of −ΔSM in the samples of EuTi1 − xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) under different magnetic fields and different temperatures. The for EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) reach 40.5 J⋅kg−1·K−1, 33.9 J⋅kg−1·K−1, 38.9 J⋅kg−1·K−1, 35.6 J⋅kg−1·K−1, and 34.9 J⋅kg−1·K−1, respectively. The values of −ΔSM monotonically increase as the applied magnetic field increases and the maximum values of are obtained near the magnetic transition temperature. Figure 7 shows the values of −ΔSM of EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) as a function of the temperature with the magnetic field changed from 10 kOe, 20 kOe to 50 kOe. Since the value of −ΔSM below the transition temperature is increased with the increase of the doping Co ion content, it can be obviously observed that the value of −ΔSM below the transition temperature is significantly increased, under a magnetic field change 0–10 kOe, the value of reaches 10 J⋅kg−1·K−1 for EuTi0.95Co0.05O3. Meanwhile, the values of −ΔSM are almost the same under a magnetic field change 0–20 kOe and 0–50 kOe. Therefore, the decrease of magentic moment caused by Co and Eu interactions in the large magnetic field is disadvantageous. It is larger and more comparable than those of most potential magnetic refrigerant materials in a similar magnetic transition temperature under the same field change (20 kOe), such as TmCuAl (17.2 J⋅kg−1·K−1),[28] ErMn2Si2 (20 J⋅kg−1·K−1),[29] ErRu2Si2 (11 J⋅kg−1·K−1).[30]

Fig. 6. (color online) Temperature dependences of magnetic entropy change for EuTi1−xCoxO3 under different magnetic fields (x = 0 (a); x = 0.025 (b); x = 0.05 (c); x = 0.075 (d); x = 0.1 (e)).
Fig. 7. (color online) Temperature dependences of magnetic entropy change for EuTi1−xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) under magnetic field 10 kOe (a), 20 kOe (b), and 50 kOe (c).

RC is a measure of how much heat can be transferred between the cold and the hot sinks in an ideal refrigeration cycle, which is another important parameter. The RC, defined as a cooling capacity of , where T1 and T2 are the temperatures at half maximum of the peak taken as the integration limits.[31] The RC values of EuTi1 − xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) were calculated under 10 kOe, 20 kOe, and 50 kOe of the magnetic field, as shown in Table 1. The maximum values of RC reach 38.5 J⋅kg−1 and 296.1 J⋅kg−1 for EuTi0.95Co0.05O3 under the magnetic field changes of 10 kOe and 50 kOe, respectively. Therefore, Eu1−xCoxTiO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) compounds appear to be promising materials for low temperature refrigeration.

Table 1.

The content of Co3+ dependences of RC for EuTi1 − xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1) under magnetic fields of 10 kOe, 20 kOe, and 50 kOe.

.
4. Conclusion

A giant reversible MCE in EuTi1 − xCoxO3 (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1) compounds was observed under low fields. Due to the larger size of Co2+ ion (∼ 0.745Å) than that of Ti4+ ion (∼ 0.605 Å), the diffraction peaks showed a left shift after Co2+ ion doping. The EuTiO3 exhibited the G-type AFM, while the delicate balance between AFM and FM phases in the EuTiO3 compound was changed, when the Ti4+ ions were substituted by Co2+ ions in the compound. Under a low magnetic field change (0–10) kOe, the values of achieved 10 J⋅kg−1·K−1 and the RC reached 38.5 J⋅kg−1 for EuTi0.95Co0.05O3. In conclusion, the experimental results show that EuTi1−xCoxO3 compounds can be considered as promising materials for low-temperature and low-field magnetic refrigerant.

Reference
[1] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A Tsokol A O 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1479
[2] Guo Z B Du Y W Zhu J S Huang H Ding W P Feng D 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1142
[3] Wada H Tanabe Y 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 3302
[4] Tegus O Bao L H Song L 2013 Chin Phys. 22 037506
[5] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R Zhang X 2000 Chin. Phys. 9 550
[6] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 3460
[7] Hashimoto T Kuzuhara T Sahashi M Inomata K Tomokiyo A Yayama H 1987 J. Appl. Phys. 62 3873
[8] Khan M Gschneidner K A Pecharsky V K 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 09A904
[9] Hashimoto T Kurihara T Matsumoto K Sahashi M Inomata K Tomokiyo A 1987 J. Appl. Phys. 26 1673
[10] Campoy J C P Plaza E J R Coelho A A Gama S 2006 Phys. Rev. 74 134410
[11] Zheng X Q Shen B G 2017 Chin. Phys. 26 027501
[12] Singh N K Suresh K G Nirmala R Nigam A K Malik S K 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 302 302
[13] Zhang H Shen B G 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 127504
[14] Rushchanskii K Z Kamba S Goian V Vanek P Savinov M Prokleska J 2010 Nature Mater. 9 649
[15] Akamatsu H Kumagai Y Oba F Fujita K Murakami H Tanaka K Tanaka I 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 214421
[16] Wei T Song Q G Zhou Q J Li Z P Qi X L Liu W P 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 599
[17] Kańtil J Javorský P Andreev A V 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 2318
[18] Lee J H Fang L Vlahos E 2010 Nature 466 954
[19] Rubi K Kumar P Repaka D V M Chen R Wang J S Mahendiran R 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 032407
[20] Mo Z J Hao Z H Deng J Z Shen J Li L Wu J F Feng X H Ji R S Shen B G 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 694 235
[21] Mo Z J Sun Q L Wang C H Wu H Z Li L Meng F B Tang C C Zhao Y Shen J 2016 Ceram. Int.
[22] Roy S Khan N Mandal P 2016 Apl. Materials. 4 1479
[23] Yang H Wang H Y Yoon J 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 3794
[24] Takahashi K S Onoda M Kawasaki M Nagaosa N Tokura Y 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 057204
[25] Shvartsman V V Borisov P Kleemann W Kamba S Katsufuji T 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 064426
[26] Banerjee S K 1964 Phys. Lett. 12 16
[27] Gschneidner K A Pecharsky V K Pecharsky A O Zimm C B 1999 Mater. Sci. Forum. 315 69
[28] Mo Z J Shen J Yan L Q Wu J F Wang L C Tang C C Shen B G 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 192407
[29] Li L Nishimura K Hutchison W D Qian Z Huo D Namiki T 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 152403
[30] Gupta S Suresh K G 2013 Mater. Lett. 113 195
[31] Kolodiazhnyi T Valant M Williams J R Bugnet M Botton G A Ohashi N Sakka Y 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 083719